Are we really looking for possible measures to contrast Terrorism or are we only loosing time and money? EU pushes for quick decision on new anti-terror law | euronews, world news

Screen Shot 2015-01-25 at 18.18.48


I do not want to step into politics, but allowed me to provide an harsh comment to the EU counter terrorism Project (and of course actual status)!

As short introduction, I think important to underline how and when Europe got the “Union” word, therefore I would like you all to carefully read a paragraph copied at the link of EU (here)

“we should underline that With the collapse of communism across central and eastern Europe, Europeans become closer neighbours. In 1993 the Single Market is completed with the ‘four freedoms’ of: movement of goods, services, people and money. The 1990s is also the decade of two treaties, the ‘Maastricht’ Treaty on European Union in 1993 and the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1999. People are concerned about how to protect the environment and also how Europeans can act together when it comes to security and defence matters. In 1995 the EU gains three more new members, Austria, Finland and Sweden. A small village in Luxembourg gives its name to the ‘Schengen’ agreements that gradually allow people to travel without having their passports checked at the borders. Millions of young people study in other countries with EU support. Communication is made easier as more and more people start using mobile phones and the internet.”

Ok, after this clear description of what EU wanted, and would like to be, let’s go back to what has been the discussion of this week in the EU parliament:

The EU wants a quick decision on a new law that will force governments to share air passenger data. The draft bill, first proposed in 2011, is being looked at again after the Paris attacks amid fears about returning jihadists from Syria. A committee of MEPs rejected the legislation in 2013.

Now, after the above sentence, allowed me to exclaim… ARE YOU KIDDING ME? WHAT THE @@@@@@ IS THIS DISCUSSION?

In my perception, when talking about “UNITY”, it should be compulsory to have such unity also and especially in these matters that really concern people… so as I underline on the paragraph copied by EU site “People are concerned about how to protect the environment and also how Europeans can act together when it comes to security and defence matters“, security and defence should not be matter of discussion, not anymore! but “apparently” this is not the actual status

If we, EUROPEAN CITIZENS, want to be safe and protected, we need to act in order to be safe and protected, all together, like if we where just a “single nation”.

Nowadays, when we are already talking of EU, it is not anymore the time to claim for this kind of “privacy right”; in instance, in each single Nation of the European Union, police forces have the right to control anybody, have the right to exchange information between police stations etc. So why, if we live in the EU, we still have to authorise police forces to investigate on European people (and anybody traveling or visiting Europe)?

Meanwhile in EU we still have a lot of discussion on the scan of finger print, when anybody travel to USA, or UAE etc, hi/she has to provide his/her fingerprint! why not in EU?

Although I agree with people that claim for privacy, although I agree with people that concern about a miss use (or abuse) of certain “Control powers”, I strongly believe that we need to understand what are the proper boundaries of privacy.  In a society, where our credit card, cell phone, TV subscription, Internet etc etc, collect millions of data in order to provide better Info to whom will sell or advertise goods, I remained stunned when people believe that the same information cannot be freely provided to police forces.

Probably people and especially our politicians prefer to suffer of a terroristic attack rather than understand that sometime we need to give something in order to receive something! and Safety and security is way more important than not tell police that I am in paris or in Rome.  it will anyway show up as soon as I connect in Internet!!!!

As final consideration, and in the hope that some Politic responsible for these decision read my article, I personally prefer police to know my movement within EU rather than see soldiers patrolling my city streets! 

Have fun with the following incredible reality…

via EU pushes for quick decision on new anti-terror law | euronews, world news.

Mossad said helping Brussels seek terror mastermind | The Times of Israel

The news about “the seeking of terror mastermind” keep flowing on the net.

Of course many agency are now working together in order to capture the responsible for the recent terroristic attack happened in paris.

But Again, I am wondering whether the dislocation of Military forces in our territory is something necessary or in any case Helpful!

Live a comment!

Mossad said helping Brussels seek terror mastermind | The Times of Israel.

Francia, attacco killer a Charlie Hebdo: 12 vittime, 8 feriti, 4 gravissimi – La Gazzetta dello Sport

Francia, attacco killer a Charlie Hebdo: 12 vittime, 8 feriti, 4 gravissimi – La Gazzetta dello Sport.

Paris Attack

I am astonished!
each day one new attack perpetrated by terrorists in name of their God!
Today in Paris, 12 unarmed people shoot dead, one police officer executed (in the video).
All this happen also because we believe that our society is safe, and we have been taught that having a weapon for self defence is “Bad” is “devil”!
But let me ask this: what about if instead of filming the event with a mobile, the guy would have had a weapon? probably at least the Police man would have been injured but not executed…
My thought now goes to the victims families’ and the victims! R.I.P.

Sono Basito!
Ogni giorno un nuovo attacco perpetrato da terroristi in nome del loro Dio!
Oggi a parigi, 12 persone disarmate uccise a sangue freddo, un poliziotto giustiziato (nel video)
Tutto questo succede anche perché noi tutti pensiamo che la nostra sia una società sicura, e ci è stato insegnato che avere un arma per difesa personale è “male”, è “il Diavolo”!
Ma lasciatemi chiedere questo: E se invece di filmare il tragico evento con un telefonino, quest’uomo avesse avuto un arma? probabilmente, almeno il poliziotto sarebbe stato si ferito ma non giustiziato…
Il mio pensiero va alle famiglie delle vittime ed alle vittime! R.I.P.